The density scales as (in the
coordinates), implied by the scalings of
and
. The
scaling of the density suggests that the natural dynamical time (free fall time)
inside the star
may be
. Then if we cannot assume almost stationary condition on the stars, it is
difficult to use the post-Newtonian approximation [80
, 81
]. In practice, however, our formalism
is still applicable to pulsating stars if the effect of pulsation is not important in the orbital
motion.
The velocity of stellar rotation is assumed to be . In other words, we assume that the star rotates slowly and is pressure
supported6.
By this assumption, the spin-orbit coupling force appears at 2 PN order rather than the usual 1.5 PN
order. The slowly spinning motion assumption is not crucial: In fact, it is straightforward to incorporate a
rapidly spinning compact body into our formalism.
From these initial data we have the following scalings of the star ’s stress-energy tensor components
in the body zone coordinates:
,
,
. Here the underlined
indices mean that for any tensor
,
. In [94
] , we have transformed
, the
components of the stress-energy tensor of the matter in the near zone coordinates, to
using the
transformation from the near zone coordinates to the (generalized) Fermi normal coordinates at 1 PN
order [13
]. It is difficult, however, to construct the (generalized) Fermi normal coordinates
at an high post-Newtonian order. Therefore we shall not use it. We simply assume that for
(or rather
, the source term of the relaxed Einstein equations; see Equation (63
)),
As for the field variables on the initial hypersurface, we simply assume that the field is of 2.5 PN order except for the field determined by the constraint equations. Note that the radiation reaction effect to the stars first appears at the 2.5 PN order. Futamase showed that even if one takes the field of order 1 PN, initial value of the field does not affect the subsequent motion of the system up to 2.5 PN order [80]. Thus, we expect that the initial value of the field does not affect the orbital motion of the system up to 3 PN order, though a detailed calculation has not been done yet.
It is worth noticing that the initial value formulation has some advantages. First, by using the initial value formulation one can avoid the famous runaway solution problem in a radiation reaction problem. Second, one can construct an initial condition on some spacelike hypersurface rather than at past null infinity. Putting an initial condition for the field in the past null infinity requires a prior knowledge about the spacetime, which is obtained through the time evolution of the field from the initial condition. The initial value formulation can give in a sense a realistic initial condition. In our universe there may be no past null infinity because of the big bang.
An interesting initial condition is the statistical initial condition [138]. Here the binary system is in the
background gravitational radiation bath for which we know only its statistical properties. For example, the
phase of the radiation is assumed to be random and irrelevant to the motion of the binary. The origins of
the radiation are cosmological, or related to the evolution of the system before the initial hypersurface.
Then we can evaluate the expected time evolution of the binary system by letting the system evolve from
a set of possible initial conditions and taking a statistical ensemble average over the initial
conditions.
http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2007-2 | ![]() This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 Germany License. Problems/comments to |