Giovanni Peccati, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie, France
Abstract
We show, by a simple counterexample, that the main result in a
recent paper by H. Van Zanten [Electronic Communications in
Probability 7 (2002), 215-222] is false. We eventually
point out the origin of the error.
Grimmet G. R. and Stirzaker D. R. (1992). Probability and random
processes. Oxford Science Publications. Oxford. Math. Review
93m:60002
Jacod J. and Shiryaev A. N. (1987). Limit theorems for
stochastic processes. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Math. Review
89k:60044
Protter P. (1992). Stochastic integration and
differential equations. A new approach. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Math. Review
91i:60148
Revuz D. and Yor M. (1999). Continuous martingales and Brownian motion. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Math. Review
2000h:60050
Stroock D. W. and Yor M. (1981). Some remarkable martingales.
In Séminaire de Probabilités XV, 590-603. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Math. Review
82i:60085
Van Zanten, J. H. (2002). Continuous Ocone martingales as weak limits of rescaled martingales.
Electronic Communications in Probability7, 215-222 Math. Review
2003k:60095
Vostrikova, L. and Yor, M. (2000). Some invariance properties of the laws of Ocone martingales. In Séminaire de Probabilités XXXIV, 417-431. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Math. Review
2001i:60137